3-Year Assessment Cycle in Undergraduate Programs

Jump to: Features of the 3-Year Cycle 3-Year Cycle Schedule Roles & Responsibilities

Overview

UCSC’s approach to the assessment of Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs) in undergraduate programs features a 3-year reporting cycle that provides departments and programs with key analytical support throughout the assessment process. Each year is devoted to one major task: Assess (Year 1), Reflect (Year 2), and Improve (Year 3).

Year 1: Assess

The goal of the first year is to design and run an assessment study in key courses, collecting and analyzing data about student learning.

Learn more about each Year 1 step:

STEP 1: Design a Study

STEP 2: Collect Data

STEP 3: Analyze Data

Year 2: Reflect

In year 2, faculty meet with assessment specialists to discuss the results to identify possible curriculum, program, or course improvements.

Learn more about each Year 2 step:

STEP 4: Share Results

STEP 5: Plan Changes

STEP 6: Submit Report

Year 3: Improve

In the final year, programs implement and observe the impact of changes, then meet with assessment specialists to plan the next cycle.

Learn more about each Year 3 step:

STEP 7: Implement Changes

STEP 8: Observe Impact

STEP 9: Plan Year 1


  1. A designated faculty lead will oversee assessment in every program.
  2. Every program will follow a specific schedule (see table below) in order to allow assessment specialists to provide support for every stage of the assessment process.
  3. Faculty will have one year (Year 2) to develop the implications and next steps based on their assessment results. Specialists with the Teaching and Learning Center will be available for program-specific consultations regarding pedagogical and curricular improvements.
  4. Faculty will have one year (Year 2) to develop the implications and next steps based on their assessment results. Specialists in CITL will be available for program-specific consultations regarding pedagogical and curricular improvements.
  5. Reporting requirements are simple and streamlined (Click here to learn more about the new report). Each program’s report is due at the end of Year 2.
  6. Faculty will have one year (Year 3) to implement changes.

The 3-Year PLO Cycle is staggered, with different academic divisions at different stages of the cycle in any given year. This schedule allows assessment specialists to provide support for every stage of the assessment process.


  • Work with assessment specialists to design rubrics for course activities
  • Learn about about use of rubrics for teaching and feedback, with assessment specialist assistance
  • Schedule TA trainings about rubrics (led by assessment specialists), if needed
  • Promote student survey (run by ALEEC) in class
  • Ensure that ALEEC receives assessment data by end of quarter

Year 2: Reflect

  • Collaboratively design rubric with faculty lead and instructor(s)
  • Set up outcomes-based rubric in Canvas course to integrate with grading
  • Lead TA training, if needed
  • Design & administer student survey
  • Compile assessment data
  • Conduct analysis and prepare ALEEC report (Summer)

Year 2: Reflect

Last modified: Jan 16, 2025